Whilst a simple concept, the difference between Advisory Consulting and Resource Augmentation are often confused. People confuse them as domain specific. Others wrongly consider one more complex than the other. They are simply different models, both highly valuable when required.

We are crystal clear at G MASS of our ambition for resource augmentation excellence. Below we have listed the differences between the two!

Resource Augmentation

Nature of Engagement

Provides additional skilled personnel to complement in-house teams

Focus

Primarily focuses on providing human capital, such as project resources

Control

Client has more direct control over the augmented resources and their tasks

Ownership of Outcome

The client typically owns the final product or outcome that is produced by the augmented resources

Duration

Often involves a more extended engagement as augmented resources become integrated into the client's team.

Expertise

Specialised domain skills and expertise are provided by individual resources

Cost Structure

Project dependant based on the duration of the project

Advisory Consulting

Nature of Engagement

Offers expert advice, analysis, and strategic guidance to a business

Focus

Focuses on providing high-level expertise and advisory services - often methodology-based

Control

Consultants have control in decision-making, and the client outsources their expertise

Ownership of Outcome

Consultants often provide an outcome-based solution - which is essentially the commodity

Duration

Usually, shorter-term engagements with a specific project. Can become iterative with renewed scope of services.

Expertise

Offers cross-industry knowledge and strategic insights.

Cost Structure

Fixed Price or Outcome-based